The H.263 CODEC and X-Lite softphone applications have the worst test results but still get “good” grades when tested using QoS, PSNR, and MOS parameters. The H.263+ CODEC has the best performance when paired with the PortGo softphone application. CODEC VP8 has the best performance when paired with the Zoiper softphone application. There are nine combinations of softphone application and CODEC.Based on the research results, CODEC H.264 has the best performance when paired with the Blink softphone application. Call protocols: SIP/SIPS, H.323, WebRTC, RTMP with RTP/RTCP for the media. Each softphone application will be combined with a CODEC that is native to the softphone. CODEC examined in this research are H.264, VP8, H.263+, and H.263. The quality measured by QoS, PSNR, and MOS parameters.Softphone applications examined in this research are Blink, Zoiper, MicroSIP, PortGo, Linphone, and X-Lite. This research compare the quality of video calls based on softphone application and CODEC combination. Selection of softphone and CODEC is a consideration in building a video communication network because it will affect the quality of video call. In a video call there are several components, such as IP phone or softphone, CODEC, and server.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |